Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius — Text and Context
Edition facts
The source record for Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius — Text and Context measures this digital text at 146,549 words, 10 hr 38 min estimated reading time, and 146 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 39.7 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Political science -- Early works to 1800,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
I. Of the beginnings of Cities in general, and in particular of that of Rome
II. Of the various kinds of Government; and to which of them the Roman Commonwealth belonged
III. Of the accidents which led in Rome to the creation of Tribunes of the People, whereby the Republic was made more perfect
IV. That the dissensions between the Senate and Commons of Rome made Rome free and powerful
V. Whether the guardianship of public freedom is safer in the hands of the Commons or of the Nobles; and whether those who seek to acquire power, or they who seek to maintain it, are the greater cause of commotions
VI. Whether it was possible in Rome to contrive such a Government as would have composed the differences between the Commons and the Senate
VII. That to preserve liberty in a State, there must exist the right to accuse
VIII. That calumny is as hurtful in a Commonwealth as the power to accuse is useful
IX. That to give new institutions to a Commonwealth, or to reconstruct old institutions on an entirely new basis, must be the work of one Man
X. That in proportion as the founder of a Kingdom or Commonwealth merits praise, he who founds a Tyranny deserves blame
XI. Of the Religion of the Romans
XII. That it is of much moment to make account of Religion; and that Italy, through the Roman Church, being wanting therein, has been ruined
XIII. Of the use the Romans made of Religion in giving institutions to their City; in carrying out their enterprises; and in quelling tumults
XIV. That the Romans interpreted the auspices to meet the occasion; and made a prudent show of observing the rites of Religion even when forced to disregard them; and any who rashly slighted Religion they punished
XV. How the Samnites, as a last resource in their broken fortunes, had recourse to Religion
XVI. That a People accustomed to live under a Prince, if by any accident it become free, can hardly preserve that freedom
XVII. That a corrupt People obtaining freedom can hardly preserve it
XVIII. How a free Government existing in a corrupt City may be preserved, or not existing may be created
XIX. After a strong Prince a weak Prince may maintain himself: but after one weak Prince no Kingdom can stand a second
XX. That the consecutive reigns of two valiant Princes produce great results: and that well-ordered Commonwealths are assured of a succession of valiant Rulers by whom their power and growth are rapidly extended
XXI. That it is a great reproach to a Prince or to a Commonwealth to be without a National Army
XXII. What is to be noted in the combat of the three Roman Horatii and the three Alban Curiatii
XXIII. That we should never hazard our whole fortunes, where we put not forth our entire strength; for which reason to guard a defile is often hurtful
XXIV. That well-ordered States always provide rewards and punishments for their Citizens; and never set off deserts against misdeeds
XXV. That he who would reform the institutions of a free State, must retain at least the semblance of old ways
XXVI. That a new Prince in a city or province of which he has taken possession, ought to make everything new
XXVII. That Men seldom know how to be wholly good or wholly bad
XXVIII. Whence it came that the Romans were less ungrateful to their citizens than were the Athenians
XXIX. Whether a People or a Prince is the more ungrateful
XXX. How Princes and Commonwealths may avoid the vice of ingratitude; and how a Captain or Citizen may escape being undone by it
XXXI. That the Roman Captains were never punished with extreme severity for misconduct; and where loss resulted to the Republic merely through their ignorance or want of judgment, were not punished at all
XXXII. That a Prince or Commonwealth should not defer benefits until they are forced to yield them
XXXIII. When a mischief has grown up in, or against a State, it is safer to temporize with it than to meet it with violence
XXXIV. That the authority of the Dictator did good and not harm to the Roman Republic; and that it is, not those powers which are given by the free suffrages of the People, but those which ambitious Citizens usurp for themselves that are pernicious to a State
XXXV. Why the creation of the Decemvirate in Rome, although brought about by the free and open suffrage of the Citizens, was hurtful to the liberties of that Republic
XXXVI. That Citizens who have held the higher offices of a Commonwealth should not disdain the lower
Machiavelli's Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius is not a commentary in the modern scholarly sense but a work of political analysis that treats Livy's history as a repository of usable examples. The author's method is forensic: he isolates a passage from Livy, extracts a political principle, and then tests that principle against Roman and Florentine experience. This structure—example, maxim, application—gives the work its distinctive rhythm. Machiavelli's voice is direct and pragmatic, often interrupting his own narrative with phrases like "I have noticed this point the more readily" to underline a lesson for his own republic.
The Authority of the Example
Machiavelli treats Livy's text as a source of political data rather than a literary artifact. He rarely questions the historian's accuracy; instead, he extracts from each episode a general rule. For instance, when Livy reports that the Latin praetor Annius told his council to decide what to do before worrying about what to say, Machiavelli seizes on this as "sound advice" for any prince or republic. He then immediately applies it to Florence, noting that uncertainty in deliberation has often harmed its public business. This move—from ancient example to contemporary diagnosis—is the book's central rhetorical gesture. The reader is expected to accept Livy's authority as given and to focus on the political logic Machiavelli draws from it.
The Cost of Indecision
Machiavelli returns repeatedly to the theme of decisiveness. In the excerpt concerning Syracuse after the tyrant Hieronymus's death, he quotes Apollonides, who condemned "doubt and delay" as ruinous. The passage is notable for Machiavelli's own editorializing: he praises Livy for showing "the mischief which results from resting in suspense." The Lavinian episode reinforces the point—a delayed decision to aid the Latins leads to defeat before the army even leaves the gates. Machiavelli's language here is blunt: "tardy resolves are due to want of spirit or want of strength." He does not merely describe; he judges, and his judgments are aimed at the political actors of his own time.
Voice and the Translator's Hand
Ninian Hill Thomson's 1883 translation preserves something of Machiavelli's conversational directness. The English is formal but not stiff, with a preference for concrete nouns and active verbs. Phrases like "clothe them in fit words" and "replete with wisdom" carry a slightly archaic flavor that suits the material. Thomson's preface notes his effort to keep "something of the flavour of the original," and the result is a text that reads as a series of pointed observations rather than a systematic treatise. The translator's choices—such as rendering principe as "prince" and repubblica as "commonwealth"—shape how Machiavelli's categories are understood by an English-speaking reader.
Structure as Argument
The Discourses is organized as a sequence of short chapters, each focused on a single proposition derived from Livy. The table of contents reveals the method: chapter titles such as "That the dissensions between the Senate and Commons of Rome made Rome free and powerful" announce a thesis that the chapter will defend. This structure allows Machiavelli to build his argument cumulatively, returning to themes like religion, corruption, and the role of the people across multiple chapters. The reader is not given a continuous narrative but a series of analytical vignettes. Each chapter can stand alone, yet together they form a coherent case for republican government grounded in historical precedent rather than abstract principle.
Readers approaching the Discourses for the first time should attend to Machiavelli's habit of drawing explicit lessons from Livy's anecdotes. The work rewards those who read it as a dialogue between ancient Rome and Renaissance Florence, where every historical episode carries a contemporary charge. Pay particular attention to the moments when Machiavelli shifts from analysis to prescription—those are the passages where his political thought is most sharply defined.
There’s a particular quietude in watching Machiavelli weigh Rome’s republic against its fall, always pulling lessons from stone and senate alike. It reminds me of another shelf’s conversation, where Darwin’s natural laws meet Marx’s social ones. Both books share that patient, unblinking gaze at how systems breathe, grow, and decay. Socialism and Modern Science (Darwin, Spencer, Marx) — Themes and Context sits beside the Discourses like a familiar whisper across centuries.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
What was your reading experience?
Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.