The Tyranny of God — Context and Discussion

(0 User reviews) 301

In Category - Ethics

Authors: Lewis, Joseph, 1889-1968 Digital Source: Project Gutenberg Gutenberg Release Year: 2010 First Publication Year: Not confirmed

Key Word: Free thought; Rationalism; Atheism Target Reader: Readers of public-domain and historical texts

Book Edition: Project Gutenberg digital edition Book Language: en

Edition facts

Words 19,433

Reading time 85 min

Text sections 3

The Tyranny of God — Context and Discussion can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 19,433 words, 1 hr 25 min estimated reading time, and 3 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 24.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Free thought,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Source: Project Gutenberg record #30900

Joseph Lewis's polemic against religious belief, arguing that God is a tyrannical concept and advocating for reason and atheism. The book includes endorsements from Clarence Darrow and uses mechanical analogies to challenge the idea of a soul.

Editorial Edition Score 4.5/5

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated

Description quality20 pts
Title & short description10 pts
Source metadata20 pts
Text length15 pts
Chapters / structure15 pts
EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

File: pg30900

Read the Text

Produced by Marilynda Fraser-Cunliffe, Odessa Paige Turner and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net

Original Text in bold is represented by "=", italic text by "_". In paragraph XII, line 4 "myraids" has been replaced by "myriads".

The new and daring book on the Philosophy of Atheism

=eminent lawyer, noted philosopher, and humanitarian, says=:

"Your book, 'The Tyranny of God,' is well done. It is a very clear statement of the question, bold and true beyond dispute. I am glad that you wrote it. It is as plain as the multiplication table, which doesn't mean that everyone will believe it. I thank you for writing it. I wish I were the author."

_A special edition of "The Tyranny of God," consists of two hundred and fifty copies, printed on Utopian paper, bound in limp leather, gilt top, stamped in gold. Each copy is autographed and numbered by the author._

Second edition, May, 1921 Third edition, April, 1922 Fourth edition, January, 1928 Fifth edition, April, 1930 Sixth edition, October, 1939 Seventh edition, November, 1943

THE FREETHOUGHT PRESS ASSOCIATION

COPYRIGHTED, 1921, BY FREETHOUGHT PRESS ASSOCIATION

_All Rights Reserved_

PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEDICATED TO FAY MY DEAR WIFE AND COMRADE, WHOSE LOYAL AND DEVOTED COMPANIONSHIP HAS MADE LIFE LIVABLE.

Go forth, little book, to destroy fear, prejudice and superstition, and help to install Reason in the minds of the human race to be its guide in the affairs of life and its living.

PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION

The most eloquent testimony given this little book is the fact that a second edition is made necessary only a few months after the publication of the first edition.

Favorable comments and letters of recommendation from men and women eminent in literary and scientific realms, and commendatory reviews in periodicals of high standard are, I think, sufficient cause for the belief that "The Tyranny of God" forms a necessary cog in the machinery of intellectual thought and progress.

Even those who bitterly oppose the book admit that it possesses the power to make its readers think.

Of the many opposing reviews and adverse criticism of "The Tyranny of God," not a single one offers an argument in answer to it. For the most part, their characterization has been that it is "pessimistic." As if by calling it "pessimistic," they refute its claims!

If to tell a man the true nature of a disease from which he is suffering, with the hope that he will seek a cure for his malady, is pessimism, then I am a pessimist. Is the use of a danger signal at a hazardous crossing, for the purpose of preventing disaster, pessimism?

If to literally "hold the mirror up to Nature," disclosing Nature's utter disregard for the life and feelings of man, as a warning against the extravagant and useless propagating of life, is pessimism, then surely I am a pessimist.

If a fervent desire to help Man, instead of wasting time in prayer to "God," is pessimism, I am a pessimist.

If to think, to investigate, to express one's thoughts courageously in the face of centuries old dogma is pessimism, then I must confess I am a pessimist.

If to expose sham, hypocrisy and fraud; if to open the mind and free it from fear; if to stimulate the intellect, and work for the Here instead of the "Hereafter"--if all these are classified as pessimism, then truly may I be called an arch pessimist.

"The Tyranny of God" was written to express the truth as I see it--to portray life, not as we would like to have it, but as it actually is.

Millions are still like frightened children, afraid of their own shadows. Fear of the truth is the greatest deterrent to its acceptance.

PREFACE TO THE FOURTH EDITION

I am indeed gratified to send forth the fourth edition of "The Tyranny of God."

I wish, however, to say to the reader that my book deals with life philosophically and not individually. It was from the viewpoint of life in general and the universe as a whole that the sentiments herein were expressed.

To love God is not the duty of man and one of the most important tasks to be accomplished for the human race is to destroy the Theistic conception of Life and the Universe.

The sentiments I expressed at a memorial meeting in honor of Luther Burbank last May best illustrate my convictions. I said:

"The religious person loves God so vehemently that he has no love left for Man."

May "The Tyranny of God" do much to accomplish the purpose of its author.

_Where did we come from? What are we doing here? Whither are we going?_

Continue Reading →

Joseph Lewis opens his polemic with a foreword commanding his "little book" to "destroy fear, prejudice and superstition" and install Reason as humanity's guide. The work is framed not as a neutral inquiry but as an explicit attack on the concept of God, whom Lewis casts as a tyrant. The book's multiple prefaces—spanning editions from 1921 to 1943—reveal a defensive posture: Lewis insists that calling his work "pessimistic" does not refute its claims, and he compares his warnings to a danger signal at a hazardous crossing. Clarence Darrow's endorsement, printed prominently, praises the book as "bold and true beyond dispute" and "as plain as the multiplication table."

Mechanical Man: The Body as Machine

Lewis builds his case against the supernatural by systematically reducing human faculties to mechanical processes. He describes the eye as "a chemical camera" that humans have "not only reproduced, but even improved upon." The voice is "nothing but a vibration," captured and duplicated by the phonograph. The ear is "a drum" whose function has been surpassed by the telephone. Even the body's telegraphic system of nerves, he argues, has been outstripped by wireless transmission. Lewis's recurring rhetorical move is to compare human inventions favorably to natural organs, concluding that "man's greatest inventions" make Nature's work "a simple, childish affair." This mechanical materialism extends to life itself: he asserts that the force animating our bodies is "identical" to that powering a machine, dissipating at death just as energy leaves a mechanical instrument.

The Rhetoric of Certainty: No Afterlife, No Soul

Lewis declares with absolute conviction that there is no afterlife: "when we 'breathe our last' we arrive at our eternity." He likens human life to a flower that "once blown, forever dies." The soul, he argues, is an "illogical and ill-founded" concept in light of daily demonstrations of mechanical causation. His tone is combative and dismissive of opposing views; he claims that no critic has offered an argument in answer to his book, only the label "pessimistic." Yet the excerpts show a tension: Lewis's certainty is expressed through metaphors and analogies rather than empirical proof. He insists that life is a "combustible force" no different from other forms of energy, but the evidence he offers is analogical rather than experimental.

Edison as Emblem: The Inventor as Atheist Icon

Lewis repeatedly invokes Thomas Edison as a figure who "pulled aside the veil of secrecy and penetrated the infinite." Edison's inventions—the incandescent light and the phonograph—are presented as proof that "man [is] greater than God." The book's table of contents lists an "Edison Letter to Joseph Lewis," suggesting the inventor's endorsement was a key credential. This reliance on a single figure reveals a pattern: Lewis seeks authority from scientific achievement rather than philosophical argument. The Edison references also highlight a broader strategy of contrasting human progress with divine inaction: "Nature in her laziness" fails to utilize what man adapts. For Lewis, technological mastery is the ultimate refutation of religious claims.

Readers should note that the excerpts represent only the opening and a middle section of the book; the full text includes sixteen numbered chapters and a preface to the fourth edition. Lewis's argument relies heavily on rhetorical repetition and analogical reasoning rather than systematic philosophy. His tone is unapologetically confrontational, and his evidence is drawn from early twentieth-century technology. The book is best approached as a period piece of American freethought, revealing the intellectual strategies of atheist polemic in the 1920s.

Holding The Tyranny of God, I recall my grandfather’s worn armchair, where he’d mutter about justice. That same quiet stubbornness surfaced when I later stumbled through Bygones Worth Remembering, Vol. 2 (of 2) — Reading Companion, its pages smelling of dust and lost arguments. Both books felt less like answers and more like the ache of a certain lonely evening, questioning everything softly.