Doctrine of the Will — A Reader’s Guide
Edition facts
The source record for Doctrine of the Will — A Reader’s Guide measures this digital text at 53,614 words, 3 hr 54 min estimated reading time, and 7 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 23.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Free will and determinism,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
INTRODUCTORY OBSERVATIONS.--Importance of the Subject--True and false Methods of Inquiry--Common Fault--Proper Method of Reasoning from Revelation to the System of Mental Philosophy therein pre-supposed--Errors of Method
CLASSIFICATION OF THE MENTAL FACULTIES.--Classification verified
LIBERTY AND NECESSITY.--Terms defined--Characteristics of the above Definitions--Motive defined--Liberty as opposed to Necessity, the Characteristic of the Will--Objections to Doctrine of Necessity--Doctrine of Liberty, direct Argument--Objection to an Appeal to Consciousness--Doctrine of Liberty argued from the existence of the idea of Liberty in all Minds--The Doctrine of Liberty, the Doctrine of the Bible--Necessity as held by Necessitarians--The term Certainty, as used by them--Doctrine of Ability, according to the Necessitarian Scheme--Sinful inclinations--Necessitarian Doctrine of Liberty--Ground which Necessitarians are bound to take in respect to the Doctrine of Ability--Doctrine of Necessity, as regarded by Necessitarians of different Schools
EXTENT AND LIMITS OF THE LIBERTY OF THE WILL.--Strongest Motive--Reasoning in a Circle
GREATEST APPARENT GOOD.--Phrase defined--Its meaning according to Edwards--The Will not always as the Dictates of the Intelligence--Not always as the strongest desire--Nor as the Intelligence and Sensibility combined--Necessitarian Argument--Motives cause acts of the Will, in what sense--Particular Volitions, how accounted for--Facts wrongly accounted for--Choosing between Objects known to be equal, how treated by Necessitarians--Palpable Mistake
DOCTRINE OF LIBERTY AND THE DIVINE PRESCIENCE.--Dangers to be avoided--Mistake respecting Divine Prescience--Inconsistency of Necessitarians--Necessitarian Objection
DOCTRINE OF LIBERTY AND THE DIVINE PURPOSES AND AGENCY.--God's Purposes consistent with the Liberty of Creatures--Senses in which God purposed moral Good and Evil--Death of the Incorrigible preordained, but not willed--God not responsible for their Death--Sin a Mystery--Conclusion from the above
OBLIGATION PREDICABLE ONLY OF THE WILL.--Men not responsible for the Sin of their progenitors--Constitutional Ill-desert--Present Impossibilities not required
STANDARD OF MORAL CHARACTER.--Sincerity, and not Intensity, the true Standard
MORAL ACTS NEVER OF A MIXED CHARACTER.--Acts of Will resulting from a variety of Motives--Loving with a greater Intensity at one time than another--Momentary Revolutions of Character
RELATIONS OF THE WILL TO THE INTELLIGENCE AND SENSIBILITY, IN STATES MORALLY RIGHT, OR WRONG.--Those who are and are not virtuous, how distinguished--Selfishness and Benevolence--Common Mistake--Defective forms of Virtue--Test of Conformity to Moral Principle--Common Mistake--Love as required by the Moral Law--Identity of Character among all Beings morally Virtuous
ELEMENT OF THE WILL IN COMPLEX PHENOMENA.--Natural Propensities--Sensation, Emotion, Desire, and Wish defined--Anger, Pride, Ambition, &c.--Religious Affections--Repentance--Love--Faith-- Convictions, Feelings and external Actions, why required or prohibited-- Our Responsibility in respect to such Phenomena--Feelings how controlled by the Will--Relation of Faith to other Exercises morally right
INFLUENCE OF THE WILL IN INTELLECTUAL JUDGMENTS.--Men often voluntary in their Opinions--Error not from the Intelligence, but Will--Primary Faculties cannot err--So of the secondary Faculties--Assumptions-- Pre-judgments--Intellect not deceived in Pre-judgments--Mind, how influenced by them--Influences which induce false Assumptions--Cases in which we are apparently, though not really, misled by the Intelligence
LIBERTY AND SERVITUDE.--Liberty as opposed to moral Servitude--Mistake of German Metaphysicians--Moral Servitude of the race
LIBERTY AND DEPENDENCE.--Common Impression--Spirit of Dependence--Doctrine of Necessity tends not to induce this Spirit--Doctrine of Liberty does--God controls all Influences under which Creatures act--Dependence on account of moral Servitude
FORMATION OF CHARACTER.--Commonly how accounted for--The voluntary element to be taken into the account--Example in Illustration-- Diversities of Character
CONCLUDING REFLECTIONS.--Objection, The Will has its Laws--Objection, God dethroned from his Supremacy if the Doctrine of Liberty is true--Great and good Men have held the doctrine of Necessity--Last Resort--Willing and aiming to perform impossibilities--Thought at Parting
Asa Mahan opens Doctrine of the Will with a dedicatory preface and a table of contents that immediately signals his systematic approach: he will define terms, classify mental faculties, and then argue for liberty against necessity. The work is structured as a direct engagement with Jonathan Edwards's necessitarian position, but Mahan also addresses a broader tradition of thinkers who deny libertarian free will. His method is to reason from revelation to the system of mental philosophy presupposed in Scripture, a move that sets his project apart from purely secular treatments.
Definitions and the Central Dispute
Mahan devotes considerable space to defining key terms such as liberty, necessity, and motive. He insists that liberty is opposed to necessity, not to influence, and that the will is not always determined by the strongest motive. This directly challenges Edwards's claim that the will is as the greatest apparent good. Mahan argues that the will can choose between objects known to be equal, a possibility necessitarians deny. His definitions are precise and intended to clear away confusion before the main argument begins.
Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom
A significant portion of the text addresses the apparent contradiction between divine foreknowledge and free will. Mahan argues that the conflict arises only if we conceive of God's foreknowledge as operating like our own—by induction from causes. He suggests that God may perceive future free acts directly, just as we perceive past ones by memory. This analogy, he admits, is difficult to conceive, but he insists that the mystery is no greater than that of memory. He then charges necessitarians with inconsistency: they appeal to mystery in religion yet assume they fully understand God's mode of knowing when arguing against liberty.
Moral Responsibility and the Will
Mahan holds that obligation is predicable only of the will, and that men are not responsible for the sin of others. He distinguishes between God's purposes and his will, arguing that God may purpose moral evil without willing it. The death of the incorrigible is preordained but not willed by God, and God is not responsible for it. Sin remains a mystery, but Mahan insists that the doctrine of liberty is the doctrine of the Bible. Throughout, he maintains that the will's freedom is essential to moral accountability, a point he defends against necessitarian objections.
Readers approaching Doctrine of the Will should attend to Mahan's careful definitions and his method of reasoning from revelation. The work is a sustained argument, not a neutral survey, and it presupposes familiarity with Edwards's Freedom of the Will. Mahan's tone is combative but scholarly, and his use of analogy—especially the comparison of divine foreknowledge to memory—is a distinctive feature. The book rewards close reading of its logical structure and its engagement with opposing views.
Flipping through Mahan’s crisp arguments about will and necessity, I found myself thinking of another, stranger volume—The Inevitable Crimes of Celibacy The Vices of Convents and Monasteries, Priests and Nuns — Background and Themes. Both wrestle with what happens when human desire meets an unyielding rule. Mahan dissects freedom abstractly; the other, quietly, shows lives crushed by its denial. A single thread connects them, I suppose.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
What was your reading experience?
Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.