The Destinies of the Stars — Reading Notes
Edition facts
Before opening The Destinies of the Stars — Reading Notes, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 49,538 words, 3 hr 36 min estimated reading time, and 13 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 18.6 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Mars (Planet),” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
abi-dynasty (about 2000 B.C.) the Sun, Shamash, was accepted as supreme god, but the Moon remained the regulator of time for religious purposes. For astrological forecasts the priests preferred to use the Moon, and the “signs” in the Moon were the most important. This is true of astrological prophecies also at the time of Tycho Brahe. “Oh, Sin, thou tellest the oracles to the gods who pray them of thee,” reads an incantation. From Babylon, the heart of civilization, Moon-worship spread to Arabs and other Semites, and with the Hebrews, as Bergström remarks, the Moon originally played a far greater part than the Sun, although at the time of Christ the condition was reversed. Nevertheless, the Moon has still retained its position as chronographer in the Church Calendar. In Psalms 104:19 we read: “He appointed the Moon for seasons.”
In general, we have built on the belief that the stellar bodies made an impression on men by virtue of the light they radiate and it has therefore been difficult to explain why the Moon ranked above the Sun. It is frequently said that the Sun (in Babylonia) was considered an enemy of mankind as its heat destroyed the vegetation. (It is true that a period of severe drought occurs there in the height of the summer.) As opposed to this, the moonlit nights would be considered refreshing and salutary. Another explanation is essayed by Bergström, who says that the luminous Moon with its ever-changing shape appealed to the imagination of primitive people in a far higher degree than the fairly constantly brilliant Sun. He is partly correct; the enormous variation in luminosity from full to new Moon enables the observer to notice the difference from night to night. The change by about one hour in each twenty-four hours of the time for the rising and setting of the Moon as compared to the disappearance and reappearance of sunlight, and more important yet the short periods of the Moon phases which leave the observations from each receding phase fresh in memory,--both these phenomena contribute toward the high value of the Moon’s synodic revolution as a measure of protracted time duration. The purely practical need dominates, not, probably, any desire to visualize the changes in legends. The Australian negroes use four different names for the Moon according to its four quarters, showing that they, in all probability, believe themselves confronted with four different stellar bodies, just as the Greeks at the time of Homer considered the morning- and the evening-star, _i. e._ Venus, as two separate planets.
On the other hand, no ground worth mentioning supports the theory that the scorching heat of the Sun diminished the peoples’ inclination for its worship. On the contrary, homage was generally rendered to phenomena one feared. It is further not true that the Babylonians themselves considered the Sun, Shamash, hostile, the Moon, Sin, friendly. The Sun-god, Shamash, by virtue of his light, was believed to give life and health. The scorching quality of the Sun was attributed to another god, Nergal, prince of the underworld, demon of war and slaughter, source of fever, and, pre-eminently, of plague. No reason existed, therefore, why Shamash should take second rank after Sin, who is said “to carry water and fire,” meaning, according to Schrader, that he brought fits of ague and fever. When the Sun after the oppressive day sinks behind the horizon, it is well known that a sharp fall of temperature occurs, particularly in arid zones, but also in humid regions within the tropics where this very phenomenon is utilized for the production of ice. He who exposes himself to the sudden cold of the night falls an easy prey to illness. Particularly is this true under a clear sky--primitive people say “when the Moon shines”--because of the strong radiation. Those who sleep in moonlight are struck by delirium and madness according to primitive thought, an opinion by no means dead among civilized nations--it is common with seafaring men--and is no doubt the origin of the expression: moonstruck (German: _mondsuchtig_, Ital.: _lunatico_, French: _lunatique_, Swedish: _månadsrasande_, etc.). To this belief has probably contributed the fact that epileptic fits frequently possess a period nearly corresponding to the synodical month, which, as I have shown elsewhere, most likely depends on a periodic change in the atmospheric electricity.
Svante Arrhenius, recipient of the 1903 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his work on electrolytes, turns his quantitative eye to the planets in The Destinies of the Stars. The translator, J. E. Fries, frames this shift from the “infinitely small” to the “infinitely large” as an inevitable progression for a mind driven to “push the boundaries of the unknown.” The book’s Swedish original sold three editions in two months, suggesting a public eager for Arrhenius’s blend of hard data and speculative reach.
Numbers as Argument
Arrhenius builds his case through precise percentages and stepwise arithmetic. He calculates Earth’s albedo—the fraction of sunlight reflected—by breaking down contributions from clouds (52% coverage, albedo 65%), dust in the atmosphere, and the ground itself. The result, 49.6%, is then compared with Venus (59%) and Mars (15.4%). This methodical decomposition, presented without rhetorical flourish, makes the reader follow each term: “0.52 × 0.65 = 0.338.” The numbers themselves become the evidence, not merely illustrations.
Mars Through a Dusty Lens
Arrhenius’s treatment of Mars reveals his reliance on inference from limited data. He cites Lowell’s estimate of barometric pressure—64 mm—as “somewhat meagre grounds,” yet uses it to compute dust-settling rates via Stokes’s formula. The conclusion that Mars’s air is “extremely rarefied” because wind cannot lift much dust is a chain of reasoning, not direct observation. The reader sees Arrhenius working at the edge of knowns, pressing sparse measurements for planetary insight.
The Translator’s Philosophical Frame
Fries’s preface does more than introduce Arrhenius; it sets a philosophical stage. He traces Arrhenius’s publication history from electrochemistry to Worlds in the Making and Life of the Universe, arguing that this trajectory reveals a “soul” driven toward ultimate causes. Fries explicitly notes Arrhenius’s rejection of “purposiveness” in natural science, yet suggests the book itself may tempt him toward philosophy. This framing colors the scientific text that follows, inviting readers to see cosmic speculation as a natural outgrowth of rigorous method.
Comparative Planetology Before the Space Age
Arrhenius compares Earth, Mars, Venus, and the Moon using albedo and atmospheric dust as key variables. He notes that Earth’s cloud-free albedo (33%) is closer to Mars (15.4%) than to Venus (59%), but that clouds push Earth’s overall value toward Venus. The Moon, with “neither clouds nor dust,” serves as a baseline. This comparative approach, grounded in 1918 data, anticipates later planetary science while relying on ground-based spectroscopy and simple physical models.
Readers should approach The Destinies of the Stars as a document of its era: a Nobel laureate’s attempt to extend laboratory reasoning to the cosmos. The translator’s preface and Arrhenius’s own calculations reward attention to method over conclusion. The book’s success in Sweden suggests it satisfied a public appetite for authoritative yet accessible cosmic speculation—a role now filled by popular science writing, but here carried out with the rigor of a physical chemist.
I remember late nights with my father’s old astronomy charts, where numbers for Venus felt as vast as longing. Reading Arrhenius’s precise calculations stirred that same quiet awe. It reminded me of the endless cosmic speculation found within The Yoga-Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki, Vol. 2 (of 4), Part 2 (of 2) — Inside the Classic, where worlds unfold not from physics, but from pure thought itself.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How will you remember this book?
Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.